He is referring to this:http://sgforums.com/forums/1962/topics/126888
Haha.. Better be even more light footed! PETROL INCREASE AGAIN!!!!RT- siong... walk also siong leh... someone vomited after the run.. I jog within my limit... got exercise better then I never start at all.
I have read and understand what the writer going to tell us, he saying in order to have a better FC (fuel comsumption), need to accelerate above 2500rpm. So more or high FC meaning bad or poor FC, this is the question I posted to clarify with xuan511 here. Pls read again the statement I highlite in red.
He meant more FC good for more then 2.5 and below is bad. Let the poster explain better. NotYetz - You siang. You stalker me ah? Kidding. Yup Im Josho from CS
Ya... mi stalker... You were a panny user right? (If my memory didn't fail me...) Better talk something about FC before I'm flagged for Hmmmm... I've been wondering... does a failing battery contribute to increasing FC?
use to be Panny then Ninny, then Canny. Battery I dunno, but I changed it because mine isn't maintenance free
Mi Panny straight to Canny... along the way also became a bessie.... haha... I just changed mine to MF too... I thought my poor FC was due to the battery... will monitor now that my battery just changed... (but doesn't look to be the issue)...
Whats ur nick, my lovely stalker I missed out out. I was Nikky before going to Fuky then lovely Canny. Great Cammy.! Bessie!I tot MF = Mu ...Fu... Think you must monitor closely... Mine suddenly ok.. now 150km at 1/4 tank.. Not as bad koz previously 174 at half tank because I tried the 2.5rpm method.
I don't post much in CS... my nick is jaix_sg or something i think... can't really remember... haven't posted in long time... oh ya, that was the reason why you were so 'eye-catching'... moving from nikky to fuky... i remembered thinking "wah... this guy rich siah"... hahaha But I did missed out your Canny stage... MF = maintainence free lah. Wah... 150km at 1/4 quarter is very very good! Mi now trying the 2.5rpm method... but seems like it's a little fast for me after being so light footed... now I'm barely 70km at 1/4 tank. what rongshu suggested makes sense to me. maybe TS can try try then let us know?
I dun wan drive too fast so I am below 2.5rpm. Later will pump petrol in case of heart attack increase on petrol I'm not rich, dey. I buy and sell and sell. That's why I only use 2 lens now and save a lot of $ by not buying non stop range of lens.
Something strange... my first quarter I only did about 70km... I guess it's because I was using the >2.5krpm... after the 1st quarter just gave up and drive my normal slow-mo way (<2.0krpm). Just now, I noticed that I hit about 240+ at half tank mark! Maybe the battery does contribute afterall... anyway... I will continue to monitor. 2 lens? Hmmmm... lemme guess... 17-40 L + 70-200 L + 1Ds-Mark III?